New

Published on:

August 26, 2025

Swipe Admin

Blog |

Explore GST

Basics of GST

Applicability of section 75(2) of the CGST Act 2017 and its impact on limitation

Section 75(2) of the CGST Act 2017 explains how the time limit for GST cases changes when a court or tribunal issues a stay order. When a stay is in place, the time during that stay does not count toward the deadline for completing GST assessments or demands. This rule is important because it helps make sure that legal delays don’t unfairly affect the rights of either the tax authorities or the taxpayers.

What Section 75(2) of the CGST Act 2017 Says

Context of the Section:

Section 75 falls under Chapter XV of the CGST Act, which deals with "Demands and Recovery".

Sub-section (2) specifically deals with limitation — the time period within which a GST officer must issue an order.

Key Provision:

Section 75(2) states that any period during which an order from a court or tribunal stays the tax proceeding shall be excluded from the limitation period.

Purpose of this Clause:

To ensure that the time lost due to legal stays (by courts or tribunals) does not disadvantage the tax department.

Prevents expiry of limitation due to delays beyond the control of tax officers.

Simple Example:

If the time limit to pass an order is 3 years, and a court stay lasted for 6 months, the order can be passed within 3 years plus 6 months.

Who Benefits?

Mostly helps tax authorities, but it also gives clarity to taxpayers regarding timeline adjustments in legal cases.

Legal Nature:

This section is mandatory in nature and is applied automatically when a stay is involved.

It prevents misuse of stay orders to escape GST liability by exhausting the limitation period.

Connection to Limitation:

The limitation period is the legally allowed time to issue a tax demand or assessment order.

Section 75(2) ensures this period is extended fairly when judicial intervention pauses the process.

Explore:Demand and Recovery under Section 73-74 of CGST Act: A Comprehensive Guide

When Does Section 75(2) Apply?

When a Stay is Ordered:

Section 75(2) applies only when a stay order is given by a court or tribunal.

This stay order must pause or delay the GST proceedings (like assessment, demand, or recovery).

During Ongoing GST Proceedings:

If a GST officer is in the process of issuing a show cause notice or final order and a court stops the process temporarily, Section 75(2) becomes applicable.

Applies to Time Limits:

It affects the counting of time (limitation period) within which the tax authority must complete an action.

Only for Period of Stay:

The section applies to only that period during which the stay remains in force.

Once the stay is lifted, the limitation period resumes from where it paused.

Example to Clarify:

Suppose an officer has 6 months left to issue an order, and a court puts a stay for 3 months.

After the stay ends, the officer still has the same 6 months to act — the 3 months of stay don’t count.

Automatic Application:

There is no need to apply separately — this section comes into play automatically when a valid stay exists.

Key Documents Required:

A copy of the stay order and its duration are needed to apply Section 75(2) correctly.

How Section 75(2) Affects Limitation Periods

Meaning of Limitation Period:

In GST, a limitation period is the maximum time allowed by law for tax officers to issue orders (like assessment, demand, or penalty).

Normal Limitation Time:

Generally, GST officers must pass the final order within 3 to 5 years from the due date, depending on the type of case.

Effect of Court/Tribunal Stay:

If a court or tribunal issues a stay during proceedings, the clock stops ticking for that period.

Exclusion of Stay Period:

The entire time during which the stay is active is excluded from the calculation of the limitation period.

Practical Impact:

This prevents tax proceedings from getting dismissed just because the officer ran out of time due to a stay.

Example for Clarity:

If 2 years have passed in a 3-year limitation, and then a court puts a 4-month stay:

After the stay ends, the officer still has 1 year left.

The 4-month stay is not counted in the 3 years.

Legal Protection:

This protects tax officers from losing their legal right to issue an order because of delays they couldn’t control.

Ensures Fairness:

The section helps ensure fair timelines for both the department and the taxpayer when legal interruptions happen.

You Can Also Read: ‍Person Not Liable for Registration Under GST - Section 23 of CGST Act

Legal Interpretation of Section 75(2)

Section Type – Procedural, Not Penal:

Section 75(2) is a procedural law, meaning it deals with the process of calculating limitation, not with punishment or liability.

Mandatory in Nature:

Courts have interpreted this section as mandatory, which means it must be applied when a valid stay exists.

It is not optional for officers.

Automatic Application:

The benefit of this section automatically applies once a court or tribunal grants a stay order that affects GST proceedings.

Stay Period Must Be Clear:

For the section to apply, the dates of the stay order must be clearly known so that they can be excluded from the limitation period.

Purpose Behind It:

The law is meant to protect the rights of tax authorities so they don’t lose time due to legal delays.

At the same time, it gives transparency to taxpayers about how timelines are adjusted.

Interpreted in Favor of Justice:

Courts interpret this section in a way that ensures neither party (officer or taxpayer) is unfairly affected by delays caused by a stay.

Backed by Case Laws:

Various High Courts and Tribunals have supported the application of Section 75(2), especially when the delay was genuinely due to a stay.

Cannot Be Misused:

Officers must show proof of the stay order and its duration.

They cannot claim extra time without a valid legal reason.

What Taxpayers Need to Know About Section 75(2)

Time Exclusion Can Extend Cases:

If there’s a stay order from a court or tribunal, the limitation period gets extended by that stay duration.

This means the case may take longer to complete than expected.

Stay Does Not Close the Case:

A stay does not cancel the tax case. It only puts it on hold temporarily.

Once the stay is lifted, the case will resume from where it left off.

Know the Timeline Adjustments:

Taxpayers should be aware that the normal deadlines (like 3 or 5 years) may be extended if a stay was involved.

Check for Validity of Stay Orders:

Make sure that any stay order received is official, with clear dates mentioned.

These dates are important for calculating the correct time limits.

Stay Period Must Be Counted Separately:

Taxpayers should know how to separate stay duration from the total time taken in the case to avoid confusion.

Track Communication from GST Authorities:

After a stay is lifted, GST officers may issue notices or orders.

Taxpayers should respond in time and stay informed to avoid penalties.

Legal Support May Be Needed:

If confused about how much time is left or whether a proceeding is still valid, it’s better to consult a tax professional or legal expert.

Protection from Unfair Action:

Section 75(2) ensures fairness. Taxpayers cannot be penalized for delay caused purely due to a court/tribunal stay and officers must follow proper procedure.

Explore:Amendment to Section 43B: The Impact on Taxpayers and Small Businesses

Conclusion

Section 75(2) of CGST Act 2017 ensures that the time limit for a GST case is fair until the period in which a legal stay exists. This helps to protect both taxpayers and tax authorities from delays and ensure that the process is completed at a good time

FAQ’s

What is Section 75(2) of the CGST Act?

It excludes the time during which a court or tribunal stay is in force from the GST limitation period. This helps ensure that legal delays don’t affect the authority's right to pass orders.

Who benefits from Section 75(2)?

Primarily, the tax department, but it also offers clarity and fairness to taxpayers. It ensures that cases are not closed just because of uncontrollable legal delays.